I have been waiting for the final big reversal, and finally told me to wait. There are two doubts about the male writer in front of me, which made me suspect that he is the murderer.
The first suspicious point is the accusation of the suicide girl's father. The suicide girl's father is not involved in murder. He clearly and objectively shows that the leak caused the girl's suicide. In his description, the male writer is a person with no sense of morality. Although the male writer gave an explanation later, saying that it was possible that the wife leaked the secret, but the second suspect, the male writer did not explain, that is what the lawyer's wife said, the male writer found a locked cabinet in her house, flipped through the documents, This is very peculiar. Obviously, the lawyer's wife said that neither she nor her husband knew the male writer. If her lover was the murderer and the male writer broke into her house, she and her lover would just have to plan to trap the male writer. There is no need to say that the male writer is there. This strange description of her family looking for something, what is the male writer looking for? This was my first reaction when I heard her.
The story doesn't explain at all, where did the lawyer go out the second time? Why did he go out the second time? The role of his second outing in the play is to give the male writer a chance to frame his wife, and the male writer is free from the crime There are too many coincidences.
In addition, there is a bug that can't be solved except the sheriff is extremely stupid. The male writer almost killed the person just before the police came in. The lawyer's body should be hot, and the blood has not solidified, and the male writer's story implies that the lawyer's wife After dragging the body, the sheriff did not ask someone to check whether the body was moved? If he hasn't moved, it proves that the male protagonist is 100% lying.
View more about Ittefaq reviews