The award-winning event has already taken place, and as far as this subject is concerned, it is obvious that the entire film is a rant from Polanski. An act of vindication for one's own injustice. It is a pity that the visual effects and editing techniques of the older generation are not as genius as Polanski is traditionally recognized by the outside world. The rhythm of the whole movie can be described as calm. This may also be the cry of Polanski to face the social injustice and discrimination of the year after many years. But as far as the movie itself is concerned, it really lacks passion. The main character itself is not a wronged victim, and the audience brings him into a calm onlooker perspective. And this perspective is actually enough to make people angry. Just not as intense.
As far as the picture is concerned, the wide-angle and close-up are very good, and the baroque art is breathtaking. As far as the picture is concerned, compared with the "Portrait of a Burning Woman" competing on the same stage, it is already too excellent, it can be said to be crushed. So whether the two ladies left the venue or not, it was just grandstanding. If you lose clearly, if you don't agree, please look at the screen and speak. The awards committee, knowing that it would be controversial, chose Polanski. But to be fair, it does not mean that Polanski is unstoppable. It can only be said that the reality is that the strongest opponent turned out to be "Portrait of a Burning Woman". It can be said that there is no general in Shu Liao Hua as a pioneer. Comparatively speaking, if I were the judge, I would have to pull the general out of the dwarf. Another thing, Polanski has always been controversial, why not make people feel wronged? Qudu has to leave the scene in public, you say there is no quality. It's ridiculous that you feminists hold the torch high and don't accept others' humiliation.
View more about An Officer and a Spy reviews
