(Of course, unless you say technical comments on what light, lens, etc. are from a completely professional angle.)
And this movie belongs to that.
——————
However, since it was not good enough to break the chart with four or five stars, it seems that I still have a little urge to explain.
Are Juliet and Simmel a real couple? If it is, the embarrassment and politeness of the two apparently strangers in the first half is unreasonable; if not, the intimacy in the second half is difficult to understand, especially the shave. I think the genius of the director is that it doesn't matter if it's true or false! What's more difficult is that the transition between this before and after is naturally breathtaking.
If they're fake, you'll ironically find that it seems that many people's married lives are "scripted" and predictable. If all strangers think of them as real couples; then, what is the difference between real and fake?
Simmel insists that there is no difference between true and false, and Juliet insists that there is no difference between true and false. So Juliet laughed at her sister who ignored her real brother-in-law and loved the glorified "dummy", while Simmel believed that this was the great wisdom of simplifying the complex. Juliet argues "sincerely", and Simmel finds that the debate is always the same - that men and women can never understand each other on the same platform, and can only rely on a mode of communication that is like etiquette and like syntax ( For example, "she just wanted you to put your hand on her shoulder")....It seems that the whole story is confirming Simmel's right, but at the end of the story, Simmel can't be like a "real husband" Stay, even if Juliet is willing to be that "sister" compromisingly.
I think the director is talking about movies rather than life. The story of a film doesn't matter, it's the details that matter. A good director will not only tell the story, but also mobilize the actors to play their unique and detailed acting skills. The story may be replicable, but the details are not replicable. Juliet is a person who immerses herself in the details, while Simmel is more on paper. Only the details will lead you to an unpredictable and unpredictable unknown; and only the details - as the bell behind Simmel suggests - allow time to solidify the fake stories into unique ones Authentic.
That's why, good movies don't give you the urge to explain. Because your empty and abstract language can't replace the details - those vivid body language and facial expressions, those light and shadow and rhythm; if you want to explain it, it will probably take more time than the movie.
——I
have to praise Juliet's acting skills again. All the little details are believable. I think changing the actor this film will definitely require more than half of the water.
I watched this film last week, because I just saw amour surprised to see a familiar face, so I came to see if it was Simmel.
View more about Certified Copy reviews
