I couldn't write anything at first, and I was completely speechless after reading it. When I went back and read some of the reviews of the first film and tried to recall the content of the first film, I knew the problem with the second film. Because the first part is plain, the reason why it is amazing is that the screenwriter is very powerful, the concept is very good, and the lines are interesting. It doesn't feel like much of the director's skill is in it. The first one can be said to be similar to a talk show; the second one is indeed more like a "movie" and looks more "storylike" than the first one. But without the essence of the first part, it looks like a student work. A brilliant concept and solid lines completely overshadow the lackluster lighting and stage design, but a lackluster story paired with equally lackluster performances and others can only be a disaster.
View more about The Man from Earth: Holocene reviews
