A major innovation of the film is that it does not copy the ending of the original American version. Juror No. 2, played by the director himself, asked the jurors present to find out the real murderer who killed the boy's adoptive father and bear the burden of the boy's future life. And jurors who had been clamoring for justice began to shirk. People have discovered the truth, but are unable to face the truth; people have presided over justice, but are unable to solve complex real problems. This is what makes the adaptation of the Russian version more profound than the American version
.
Comparing the Russian version and the original version of "12", we will find that the change of the jury's point of view in the latter is all impacted by the hard-to-refute factual evidence, while the change of the jury in the former is often due to subjective attitudes and differences. Changes in emotional identity. In other words, the latter convinces people with reason, while the former moves people more with affection, including the final ending, where the foothold is also affection. The Russian version of "12" embodies a good vision of abandoning prejudice and hatred, rediscovering kindness and kindness, and looking to the future, but what it highlights is the tangled and confusing reality of contemporary Russian society that cannot be avoided
.
In addition to the wonderful lines, the twelve male protagonists in the film all have excellent performances, and 12 constitute a very expressive whole. Through this film, Russia after the disintegration of the Soviet Union revealed to the world their thinking about life and justice under the new rules of the game, their pride and deep concern for Russia's rich nationality, and their commitment to Real confusion
.
The film moves freely, with plenty of flashbacks and quick transitions. In order to eliminate the unfavorable factor of the film length of more than 150 minutes, humorous details are carefully placed in the verbal statements of the indoor scenes that occupy more than 80%
.
