-
Nakia 2022-04-05 09:01:07
For the jumping beam clown is...
-
Willis 2022-04-04 09:01:08
Some movies really can't be judged as...
-
Ora 2022-04-04 09:01:08
A strong, confident, tolerant society has a broad mind to accommodate dissidents, no matter how ridiculous their dissents may be. To be right is to be wrong. Only one voice must be...
-
Weston 2022-04-04 09:01:08
When cctv6 played this video at this time, I always felt a bit profound. On the one hand, it is worth the general election of m country, and on the other hand, the new prime minister of Dongying next door takes office. Chasing the truth is always frustrating, and the hardships of this process cannot be undertaken without the courage of giants. And those deniers will still be cynical and at ease in the end, so will the pursuit of truth be attributed to the meaninglessness of Sisyphus? Is that...
-
Joey 2022-04-04 09:01:08
A mediocre running account drama. It is true that the criticism of the "Holocaust deniers" is fair, but it is very shallow. The differences between the Anglo-American legal systems, the logical motivations and psychology of Holocaust deniers, etc., are not deeply explored. Completely "one-sided". The important courtroom scenes are also a bit muddled. The female protagonist and the Virgin Mary died again, which made people feel disgusted. two and a half...
-
Eliseo 2022-04-04 09:01:08
In the Holocaust movie, this one is also considered a special angle. Taking the overthrow of the negative as the guide, the trial and debate as the main point, without adding the victim's perspective, all the victims' emotions are vented to the end, emphasizing restraint and paying attention to logic, can also tell the story very...
-
Eugenia 2022-04-03 09:01:12
The well-behaved and brilliant Mr....
-
Lamont 2022-04-03 09:01:12
1. Arguments, the male protagonist is an anti-Semitic extremist, the actor's choice is very good, and his face is so bad. 2. This kind of denial of historical facts, I think, only exists in our "powerful country". After Trump was elected, we must revise our views. Human nature is similar, of course, across...
-
Jennie 2022-04-03 09:01:12
Make up mark. higher than expected. The courtroom scenes are really wonderful~ The heroine looks a little arrogant and paranoid at first glance, and although the truth may not be clearer and clearer, but in any case, there is a chance to play against each other, and there may be so many people who move forward at a loss. It is already worthy of high-fives and admiration to still be persistent in digging out the historical truth when...
-
Troy 2022-04-03 09:01:12
The subject matter is greater than the form, and the focus of the film has been fluctuating between the female protagonist's inner fluctuation and the debate in the court trial, resulting in failure to do well in both aspects. While the event itself was shocking, the way it was laid out just scratched the surface and didn't delve into it. In addition, it may be caused by the script factor, Vichy's character creation is not successful enough, and Spo's role has not been fully...
Denial Comments
-
Andres 2022-04-07 09:01:06
A Trial Triggered by Western Democracy Farce (Denied Film Review)
The plot of the whole movie is solid. I don't know if I understand it too much or the director just wanted to point out the drawbacks of Western liberal democracy. In one of the paragraphs, the judge will tell the defense lawyer that if this point of view is what he firmly believes is correct, then...
-
Kenyon 2022-04-03 09:01:12
The strange things, consciences.
The strange things, consciences.
Trouble is , what feels best isn't necessarily what works best
.
The thing is, what feels best doesn't necessarily work.
But there is a difference between negligence which is random in its effect , and a deliberateness which is far more one-sided
. Fair.
You cant't...
-
Richard Rampton: They're a strange thing consciences. Trouble is, what feels best isn't necessarily what works best.
-
David Irving: [first lines; in a video speaking to a sympathetic audience] I don't see any reason to be tasteful about Auschwitz. I say to you quite tastelessly that more women died on the back seat of Senator Edward Kennedy's car at Chappaquiddick than ever died in a gas chamber at Auschwitz.
[audience laughing and applauding]
Deborah Lipstadt: Holocaust denial rests on four basic assertions. Number 1: That there was never any systematic or organized attempt by the Nazis to kill all of Europe's Jews. Number 2: That the numbers are far fewer than five or six million. Number 3: That there were no gas chambers or specially built extermination facilities. Number 4: That the Holocaust is therefore a myth invented by Jews to get themselves financial compensation and to further the fortunes of the State of Israel. War, the deniers say, is a bloody business. There's nothing special about the Jews, they're not unique in their suffering. They're just everyday casualties of war. What's the fuss?
Deborah Lipstadt: Okay, and here's another question, how do we know the Holocaust happened? Seriously. I'm asking. How do we prove it? Photographic evidence? Not one person in this room or outside it has ever seen a photograph of a Jew inside a gas chamber. You know why? Because the Germans made sure that none were ever taken. So how do we know? How do we *know* that so many were murdered? So what's the proof? Where's the proof? How strong is it?
