Denial evaluation action
-
Diego 2022-04-06 09:01:07
Some are beyond expectations. One is that the British legal system originally "needed Deborah to provide evidence that the Holocaust actually happened", but the team of lawyers changed their strategy to prove that "Owen was an anti-Semitic". I love that the lawyer team separates "whether there was a Holocaust" from the success of this defense. The second point is the justice's last paragraph on "freedom of speech": if a person really believes what he thinks and expresses it, should he support it? the answer is negative. Of course, the only shortcoming of the movie is also here. The point of "not all opinions are equal" is not explained logically. Instead, it is boring to start to value.
-
Aryanna 2022-04-06 09:01:07
"O, i had some damn good lawyers." From a legal point of view, the BBC is really the best courtroom production company in the world. The team of defense lawyers who denied the case are really professional idols. They are neither humble nor arrogant nor impetuous. Even if they drink alcohol, they can calm down. The sollicitor played by Mo Niang and her grandfather barrister are the dream team. Mike is an Easter egg.
-
Deborah Lipstadt: Now, some people are saying that the result of this trial will threaten free speech. I don't accept that. I'm not attacking free speech. On the contrary, I've been defending it against someone who wanted to abuse it. Freedom of speech means you can say whatever you want. What you can't do is lie and expect not to be held accountable for it. Not all opinions are equal. And some things happened, just like we say they do. Slavery happened, the Black Death happened. The Earth is round, the ice caps are melting, and Elvis is not alive.
-
Richard Rampton: They're a strange thing consciences. Trouble is, what feels best isn't necessarily what works best.