Therefore, the whole story of "Interstellar Crossing" is the closed Mobius circle, and Anne Hathaway is the one who broke this Mobius circle casually. The handshake between Matthew and Hathaway as they crossed the black hole may have a greater reincarnation.
Okay, I made up the above paragraph. It's not counted and can't be regarded as true. If you seriously discuss "Really?" with me or say "nonsense" with contempt, I have no choice but to "haha". Really, compared with the over-interpretation, what is really annoying is the nonsense that "you liberal arts students can't understand", or "the common sense you need to understand before watching "Interstellar"" etc. "Science Chicken Soup"-It is one thing to ignite curiosity about space and the theory of relativity after watching "Interstellar Crossing". It is really boring to "put falsehood" in a science fiction story. The Nolan brothers really wanted to be scientists, and they didn't have to write scripts and make movies long ago.
The logical loopholes and technical bugs of science fiction films are actually the last thing to talk about, not to mention "black holes" and "wormholes" that liberal arts students can’t talk about. There is some common sense, and Nolan also chooses. Sex is neglected. For example, only corn can be grown. What kind of beer is they drinking? If the diet is so nutritionally unbalanced, is it a fart to cough up and tuberculosis? The Nolan brothers basically made up for the leaks casually, and a greed explained all the reasons for the near-destruction of mankind. So tremble, scientists, screenwriters are so awesome, what they say is what they are! The screenwriter is an imperfect little god!
In fact, compared to the other brain-burning movie "Lucy" just on, Nolan is already considered the conscience of the industry, the story logic can be considered self-explanatory, and the in-depth part of scientific theory is very different, including most science students. The audience inside is not aware of it. The Nolan brothers also used two points on a piece of white paper very thoughtfully to popularize the "wormhole" theory in a simple way. The character design, back to basics and modular robot settings, are much more interesting and cute than Luc Besson's vinyl version of the future computer. In terms of the picture, Nolan gave up 3D and was very wise. 3D is suitable for creating closed spaces and showing the subtle realities of the parts. On the contrary, the current 2D pictures can show the vastness and desolation of the universe. It is different from "Earth Attraction" on IMAX. The magnificence.
In comparison, Luc Besson is much more mischievous. I won’t say much about converting to 3D for the Chinese market based on commercial considerations. The plot and visual effects are very impatient. Regarding the difference between the percentage of human brain development and the later changes, it’s simply a hasty end. After all, the South Korean gang boss has so many nonsensical grooves on the plot that the grooves are rotten. But one thing I also like about the two movies is that when discussing the ultimate questions of "Where to come, where to go, who am I", both big guys are quite daring-discussing this topic itself is even courageous. , Let alone the views are pretty cool. The two can be considered from the perspective of idealism and materialism respectively. The former is "the heart is not moving", the latter is interpreted based on the limits of human cognition and imagination, the latter looks harder and more nice, and the former is actually quite cool. It's just a kind of tone that I'm annoyed and don't bother to talk to you nonsense.
Nolan's care for ordinary audiences lies not only in the relative completeness of the theory, the exquisiteness and richness of the story, and the shocking attention to sound and pictures, but also in that he gave ordinary audiences the handle of "love" emotionally, and even did not hesitate to create "love". The indisputable sixth dimension. I believe you may not be able to figure out exactly what gravity makes time out of sync, but when you see the passage of Matthew's 23-year reading of his sons and daughters, and when you see the reunion of Matthew and Murphy's father and daughter across time and space, you will surely feel surging. For a commercial film, this is a cure for all diseases. In order to adapt to the emotional needs of the broadest audience, Nolan would rather be dull and lengthy the first hour, just to pave the way for the love reunion of father and daughter later.
But what is interesting is that Nolan's entire "Interstellar" has "go home" as the main driving force, but it ended in Matthew's departure again. Realizing the promise of "going home" to her daughter is just a process. It is the self-projection of Nolan's inner goal to embark on an unknown and lonely journey alone, and with a peaceful joy in his heart. On the other hand, at least in my opinion, the part of the whole movie expounding "love" is a bit harder and blunt, but expressing the emotion of loneliness is naturally smooth and colorful: the space capsule drifting on the edge of Saturn is the most magnificent in the whole movie. At the moment, the villain Matt Damon’s phrase "I didn’t set a time to wake up" was so sad that people tremble, while Matthew drove into the black hole alone, derailed scientifically and logically, but his emotional release reached a climax. The
space theme has always been the best interpretation carrier for "loneliness", and it has a natural basis for explaining "who I am, where I came from, and where I am going". With the vast universe as the background, no matter how arrogant people are, they will also have a vast world, how small a sense of compassion is for all living beings, and loneliness cannot be avoided whether it is form or content.
When we talk about loneliness, it will inevitably be associated with negative energies such as loneliness and sadness, but loneliness is not so much an emotion as it is a state, a inevitability of the beginning and end of life. When discussing with "Luo Tuozao", she explained the loneliness, and I deeply agree: "When a person yearns for loneliness, he will be afraid of loneliness; when a person understands loneliness, he will eventually enjoy loneliness." This also explains the different choices made by Matthew and Matt Damon, so Matt Damon would say the phrase "I thought I was ready, but I didn't have it."
A good director, in the final analysis, is just making up an interesting story, putting himself in a new look, and telling his confusion and attitude. The director who can shoot "Dark Knight" is powerful and rich in heart. He is not like Spielberg who chants "justice and love" in a direction. His philosophical system is much larger. The reason why I like Director Nolan is that his exploration of the inner world of himself is as brave, profound, and tireless as his exploration of space in the film.
How much is Nolan sincerity in praising "love"? The more you believe, the more doubtful it is. This is the essence of "Darkness", and here has nothing to do with the so-called morality. In "Interstellar", the daughter finally let go at the end of her life, letting go of the obsession of her life, and also lifted the shackles of her father's love. Love is the most beautiful companion in a lonely life, and it is also the last bondage of a lonely life. If the naked life can be folded in half, love may be the wormhole that connects the beginning and the end. In Buddhism, it is often said that "everything is empty", which is originally a contradiction with the so-called "advocating others to be good". Putting it here for the time being, it is a reflection of "loneliness" and "love."
In recent years, interest in understanding the world has become lower and lower, and science has become more and more suspicious. The most interesting aspect of the development of science and technology is that it has been continuously falsified. Heliocentric theory overturns geocentric theory. Later, it became clear that "there is heaven outside the sky". . The unremitting efforts of human beings to know themselves are certainly worthy of respect, but now it seems that "using a kite to catch electricity" is really very funny. One thing that the development of human science has been doing is-look, how stupid people used to be.
What's more tragic is that, according to the imagination of dimensionality, we may all be in a three-dimensional cube set by an alien for the rest of our lives. We can't even imagine what a five-dimensional and six-dimensional world will be like. It sounds so sad.
There is one thing that makes people feel a little relieved. Great literary works are never controlled by the development of science and technology, and the brilliance of philosophy and religion calms our fear of the unknown. In the cognition age of Tianyuan, we can also sigh to the universe, "Looking at the leisure of the heavens and the earth, stunned and stunned", and we can also learn about ourselves, "Life is sent to the rest of the world, but it is just like dust." Although up to now, we can't make the slightest resistance to death, but we can at least choose to "walk into that good night without gentleness", roar and rant about "the passing of light", and refuse to pass on word of mouth.
Technology is constantly being falsified, but the resonance of human emotions has never been false.
Love and loneliness, both.
WeChat public account: mydunhe
View more about Interstellar reviews
