Or, I knew it was about the dancers, but I watched it on the computer,
For me, 3D is the only reason why Pina deserves five stars. Years after it was invented, someone finally did something interesting with it. " Pina
" is not the first 3D movies, it may be the 100th, but the previous 99 just kept throwing debris out, or using high-speed motion to make you dizzy
. "Pina" has very little camera movement, and when it finally starts to sprinkle water, Most of them are splashed "inside" the screen. The
3D picture no longer has focus, and every corner is equal - when a man and a woman stand "close" to me and hug and hug, what really catches the eye is the upper left corner. In the 3D picture of the "stretching" woman in white
, objects that are very far or very close are often distracting, so those shots that make full use of the depth of field always have an unparalleled beauty
. , appearing at the beginning and end, 2D often favors the one who is the closest and the "biggest", and under 3D, all beings are equal, and each audience can choose his favorite.
A row of chairs in the distance, full of people, a The aunt stood up, walked to the camera, and put her head in her hands. At this time, she almost covered everyone behind her. However, through the triangle formed by the arms and the head, I began to peek at the people who were divided in the distance. If this is a 2D movie, even if these people are clearly identifiable, the aunt is still the only focus
besides the people, and the city and nature as the background also come alive. It's the windshield wipers close by, above the front window; in another segment, just paying attention to the McDonald's ad in the distance, as to what the people in "focus" do, I can't remember at all
it's like you and you of friends came to the same viewing point and noticed something completely different
This kind of effect, the rookie Wim Wenders may have made by accident-for the director, what is the meaning of letting the audience see different things from the same picture?
So, the first person to master 3D, the first to control "focus" on an equal footing, may be the next master, who may be tied with Eisenstein or Orson Welles to shoot some future After people watch it, it's boring ~classic~, the real value lies in enriching the language of the film
. If he succeeds, the cinema will have real meaning - I never believe in the "how is the cinema better than **", so I can't just wear it. In the place of the underwear, watching a film that can be downloaded for two hours is obviously mentally retarded. It's just that there are too many people to
show it but in the 3D world, the cinema has become the only one (temporarily), and the TV and computer can't replicate
the Shanghai Cinema's No. 1 Hall is the perfect place to witness it all, because in the popular small hall Today, only it is big enough and epic. More annoying are the green "emergency exit" lights on the left and right, they also seem to become part of the 3D, unnecessarily distracting.
A perfect 3D theater should be completely dark, maybe two more. The height difference between the rows makes the adjacent people farther away, makes the glasses no longer pinch the head, and makes the 3D picture brighter. In the silence, only you and
the novel experience brought by the movie 3D are so incredible, I I even thought of keeping the ticket stubs - this is another form of taking pictures in front of the train station. It's like throwing away the ticket and forgetting the movie. As soon as
I go out, the wind blows, the rain falls, my mind is clear, or I throw it away. Go to the dumpster - even on the road, Pina is still a good movie
View more about Pina reviews
