The initial establishment of the story was unreasonable. The police generally would not be led by the nose of the prisoner like this. They could solve the case by listening to the story and a few non-critical pieces of evidence. Anyone can be a detective. A police friend of mine said that in this case in the movie, we first check the relationship between the two deceased and whether there is any intersection, as well as the relationship between the deceased and the prisoner. The relationship between the two deceased people is very good. It all originated from the suicide of the young girl. The information in the lawyer's home, the emails and telephone records of the writer's wife and the lawyer all prove that the two of them are going to sue the lawyer, so the motive of the lawyer's murder is obvious. In addition to revenge for social murder and neuropathy, normal people usually have motives for crimes. Find out the interests of the two deceased and the prisoner, and the motive will come out. Once the motive is there, and then analyze the evidence, the writer edited The most seamless story is in vain.
In the end, I felt that even according to the movie, the forensic doctor had a lot of dereliction of duty. From the writer's final statement, we learned that the truth was that the lawyer was killed when he came back at 12 o'clock, and the result given by the forensic doctor at the time of death was 8 o'clock. 12 o'clock (this is the main reason why the sheriff can't tell who is panicking in the story of the lawyer's wife and the writer), so amateurish? For people who die immediately, the time of death can be judged within 30 minutes based on body temperature and limb stiffness. The second is the issue of changing shoes. The writer's shoes are obviously bigger than the lawyer's. The writer's shoes hurt when they put them on. There are two images of taking off their shoes and rubbing their feet. The lawyer's shoes must be too big. Some things left on the writer, such as foot skin, nails, clothing fibers, etc., such an obvious shoe problem cannot be detected by forensics? The third is the weight and composition of the drug. The forensic doctor will not take it out to test whether it is a normal drug? I simply counted the number. If the lawyer did not add the weight or changed the ingredients of the medicine, such a funny forensic doctor should be laid off.
In short, a very simple case! ! ! Maybe the real purpose of the movie is to insinuate the low level of police work?
View more about Ittefaq reviews
