He, however, still expressed some opinions, saying that the autobiography was only about Chaplin and his mistress, and that Chaplin's mean, harsh, brutal, and ruthless side was not reflected in the film, and he quoted Marlon Brando Some events in the autobiography when working with Chaplin as a backdrop.
I can't help but wonder what's their motivation for doing this? Because of the attitude of exploring the truth and rigorous scholarship? Film as an art carrier will definitely have a beautifying effect. I have no intention of arguing about those evaluations, but are they important? Chaplin brought us laughter, tears and thinking, not disaster. We are not historians, nor are we victims of his brutality. Why can't we thank and accept these wealth with a peaceful heart?
Marlon Brando also said that, like everyone, Chaplin's quality and temperament are the result of a combination of genetic factors and life experience. Our character is shaped by our own pain and misfortune. He has an instinctive insight into the secrets of human nature, but even though he is knowledgeable, he has never been able to understand his own character.
Chaplin, a comedian, was a genius and a person.
View more about Chaplin reviews
