Entertainment education

Carleton 2021-12-12 08:01:16

The movie is good. It should be recommended to Ma Mao Mao, an expert on "American Press Freedom"-perhaps she has already seen it-and to people who are blindly envious of American freedom.
That was the day when McCarthyism was in power, the two camps were facing each other clearly, and the ideology could not be sloppy. Because the subtitles were too fast, HC couldn't lift the energy, so he took a nap and woke up in a trance, muttering "Isn't this show a focus interview". He really grasped the essence. The person to person program was trying to save the comfort-seeking TV audience from the vulgar program, and endowed it with social conscience, morality, and responsibility. This is a completely different goal demand. I wonder if Wang Zhi's "face-to-face" program was inspired by this?
This overreacting confrontation is also metaphorical for the United States today. The situation of the Middle Easterners after 9/11 was quite a bit of "subversion and danger" by the communists in the 1950s, and subjective identification, prejudice, and no trial are the most dangerous. This ideology is in the name of "protecting national interests." Instigation and seditiousness are beyond the reach of ordinary people. Among them, the media role of television cannot be ignored.
I like the black-and-white "tunes" of movies, with a sense of history-although a bit delicate; I also like the mellow and sexy voices of black female singers interspersed from time to time. The jazz has an extremely complex, deep velvet texture, and the decadence and night of the metropolis. The vitality, sin and beauty, the anxiety of the soul and the entertainment of the senses...that are also the different qualities and feelings that TV may bring to you.

View more about Good Night, and Good Luck. reviews

Extended Reading
  • Lowell 2022-04-22 07:01:31

    New Year's Eve 2012.

  • Barbara 2022-04-20 09:01:43

    George Clooney is not just handsome

Good Night, and Good Luck. quotes

  • Colonel Anderson: Wouldn't you guess that the people who have seen the contents of that envelope might have a better idea of what makes someone a danger to his country, or do you think it should just be you, sir, who decides?

    Fred Friendly: Who? Who? Who are these people, sir? Who are the people? Are they elected? Are they appointed? Is it you?

  • [last lines]

    Edward R. Murrow: To those who say people wouldn't look; they wouldn't be interested; they're too complacent, indifferent and insulated, I can only reply: There is, in one reporter's opinion, considerable evidence against that contention. But even if they are right, what have they got to lose? Because if they are right, and this instrument is good for nothing but to entertain, amuse and insulate, then the tube is flickering now and we will soon see that the whole struggle is lost. This instrument can teach, it can illuminate; yes, and it can even inspire. But it can do so only to the extent that humans are determined to use it to those ends. Otherwise it is merely wires and lights in a box. Good night, and good luck.