"In the Loop" has obvious left-leaning signs in ideology, that is, as long as it is a politician, regardless of the official position, regardless of party affiliation, all are regarded as deflated. Therefore, it is not difficult to understand its lively but extremely simple plot. Under the guidance of this literary ideology, "In the Loop", which was born out of "The Thick of It", actually upholds the consistent attitude of all left-wing literary works towards politics: politicians always behave arrogantly and stupidly, and political behavior They are often absurd and greedy, and the two are in one place, just like a beaming clown in a circus. The film’s overpowering language style inherits the dialogue nature of "The Thick of It", and it highlights the possibility that there is nothing less than that, which makes people love and hate. The film also brings a different look and feel to the pseudo-documentary style. Pseudo-documentary films often use shaky shots to enhance the audience’s sense of panic on the spot, and the fancy of this film is that when people have established emotions for such pseudo-documentary shots, it does the opposite, using straightforwardness. Looking at the perspective of the character's life, it brings out a peek into the sordid daily life of the politicians, and the joy of watching movies produced by it. Pseudo documentary is to "In the Loop", what digital technology is to "Star Wars", with appropriate techniques, brings extraordinary viewing effects to the film
.
In the Loop evaluation action
2022-01-02 08:02
Extended Reading
-
Larue 2022-04-22 07:01:39
Better than documentary, discussing humorous politics; bd-iNFAMOUS
-
Tressie 2022-04-23 07:03:03
First of all, 4 stars; second, it's really a brain exercise; I thought it was translated as "psychic people" and wondered; this is not called "black humor", this is called high-level poverty, the definition is different ok; don't go to "British style" for everything Put together the above, don't think that writing this word is advanced, your whole family is British.
-
Lt. Gen. George Miller: [to Karen, about Linton Barwick] He's got his little cannons and he's got his little guns, and... This is the problem with civilians wanting to go to war. Once you've been there, once you've seen it, you never want to go again unless you absolutely fucking have to. It's like France.
-
Linton Barwick: My golly, I can't see why anyone would choose to work in a glass office, huh? Glass offices, in my opinion, are for perverts.
Bob Adriano: I could request the glass be frosted.
Linton Barwick: Frosting is on cakes, huh? Now, what else happened in London?
Bob Adriano: Ah, generally positive, two glitches...
Linton Barwick: Really, what?
Bob Adriano: Karen flagged a report by one of her staffers. She's obviously trying to use it as some kind of roadblock. It's called PWIP PIP.
Linton Barwick: PWIP what?
Bob Adriano: PWIP PIP.
Linton Barwick: What is it, a report on bird calls? What does it even stand for?
Bob Adriano: I can't recall. It's factish. Intel for and against intervention.
Linton Barwick: We have all the facts on this we need. We don't need any more facts. In the land of truth, my friend, the man with one fact is the king. You said there was something else, what is that?
Bob Adriano: In the meeting with the Foreign Office, the committee was accidentally and briefly alluded to.
Linton Barwick: Which committee?
Bob Adriano: The...
[quietly]
Bob Adriano: The war committee, sir.
Linton Barwick: All right, Karen is not to know about this, huh? She is an excitable, yapping she-dog. Get a hold of those minutes. I have to correct the record.
Bob Adriano: We can do that?
Linton Barwick: Yes, we can. Those minutes are an aide-memoire for us. They should not be a reductive record of what happened to have been said, but they should be more a full record of what was intended to have been said. I think that's the more accurate version, don't you?