In a brutal murder case in a hotel in Germany, the perpetrator Koliny shot and killed Meyer of a company with three shots and took the initiative to commit the crime. The lawyer appointed by the court as Corinne's defender was a novice who had been taken care of by Meyer and had a close relationship with Meyer's granddaughter. Facing Corinne, who didn’t speak a word and didn’t defend himself, the lawyer found out the truth behind it: It turned out that in 1944, Meyer, as the SS, was killed in retaliation for two German soldiers in front of Corinne. The face killed 20 villagers including Corinne’s father. In 1968, Germany passed a law that would not hold accountable for Nazi and World War II crimes. Corinne killed Meyer for revenge. On the eve of the court's judgment, Corinne committed suicide and the lawsuit was passively terminated.
The Collini Case movie plot
2022-01-23 08:07
Extended Reading
-
Idell 2022-03-20 09:02:53
1. Start with the taciturn suspect and start a suspenseful legal investigation. The first half of the schedule is well controlled, and the audience is attracted; 2. The special relationship between the protagonist and the victim makes the character's psychological and emotional fullness, and the role is portrayed Success; 3. Legal issues related to the history of World War II are also influential in social reality and thoughtful. It is a pity that in the final court trial, the psychological change of the professor and lawyer of the opposing side was too abrupt. Although the passage was edited with interlaced time and space to enhance emotional rendering to cover it up, it was obviously deliberate for the dramatic plot, and the character was more facialized. It is heavy, lacks key descriptions, and appears narrow, short and flat.
-
Buddy 2022-03-18 09:01:08
Germany is a rigorous and rational country ruled by law. After the war, it also carried out deep introspection and accountability on the history of the Nazis. However, the "Dreyer Act" passed in 1968 justified the Nazi war criminals and was a stain on its fair legal order. It was not the Germans themselves, but the Turkish lawyers who uncovered this historical scar, reflecting the acceptance and recognition of the integration of Turkish immigrants into the mainstream society in Germany. What is thought-provoking is also thinking about legal justice. If the law loses justice, is it still the legal order we want to maintain?
